Reviewer-expertise matcher
Judges: one (manuscript abstract, candidate reviewer's recent titles) pair. Questions: score:expertise_overlap - none|adjacent|strong; noul:likely_conflict - same group topic competitor. Action: Code adds co-author COI check; shortlist top-N for editor.
AA clean typed decision (yes/no, a pick from a list, or a level on a scale) that is concrete, repeats routinely, and has meaningful value.4.13
Key facts
- Vertical
- Research & science
- Function
- Research & education
- Status
- Idea
- Volume
- routine
- Value
- meaningful
- Risk
- moderate
- Evidence
- —
- Flags
- None
Build this with a classifier
Define a typed decision with a bounded answer, then evaluate it on examples.
{
"decision_type": "choice",
"question": "Does this input match the decision in “Reviewer-expertise matcher”?",
"input": "<input to classify>",
"output": "one label from a fixed list"
}Related use cases
Cite this
Copy a link in your preferred format.