Citation-claim support check at scale
Judges: one (claim sentence, cited abstract) pair. Questions: noul:supports - does the abstract support the claim as worded?; choice:relation - supports|contradicts|tangential|insufficient_context. Action: Flag contradicts/tangential for author; auto-pass supports at high confide
AA clean typed decision (yes/no, a pick from a list, or a level on a scale) that is concrete, repeats routinely, and has meaningful value.5.14
Key facts
- Vertical
- Research & science
- Function
- Research & education
- Status
- Idea
- Volume
- high
- Value
- meaningful
- Risk
- moderate
- Evidence
- —
- Flags
- None
Build this with a classifier
Define a typed decision with a bounded answer, then evaluate it on examples.
{
"decision_type": "choice",
"question": "Does this input match the decision in “Citation-claim support check at scale”?",
"input": "<input to classify>",
"output": "one label from a fixed list"
}Related use cases
Cite this
Copy a link in your preferred format.